Christ Pantocrator, an icon at St. Catherine’s Monastery in the Sinai (550 CE) thought by some to be sourced from the Shroud of Turin image
The Quest for the Historical Jesus

Home Page for the Quest for the Historical Jesus site.

Additional resources on the Historical Jesus Quest.

Return to: A Forensic Science CSI - Pictures of Jesus on the Shroud of Turin

An Open Letter to John Dominic Crossan

WHO IS JOHN DOMINIC CROSSAN?         
 

Dear Dom, what were you thinking?

PDF:   Read the entire letter to John Dominic Crossan.   This is an Acrobat (PDF) file, which can be viewed with most browsers. If your browser does not support PDF files, you should download the free Adobe Acrobat Reader at http://www.adobe.com.  

Tip:  You may wish to download the full letter to your computer by right-clicking here for the entire letter to John Dominic Crossan. Simply click with the right-hand button of your mouse and select the option to save the target file. You may then open the PDF file and read it or print it without being connected to the Internet. Once you have downloaded the letter, simply click on the file dearjohn.pdf, or with your browser select file-open-browse and locate the file. This method is particularly useful if you have a dial-up connection to the Internet.

This letter is about the Shroud of Turin. It is an attempt to get beyond the polemics and absurdities promulgated by both skeptics and super-believers. It contains much new material and treats the Shroud as a possible historical artifact. As such, it presents a serious challenge to much current thinking in the quest for the historical Jesus. It is an objective response to this comment by John Dominic Crossan:

My best understanding is that the Shroud of Turin is a medieval relic-forgery. I wonder whether it was done from a crucified dead body or from a crucified living body. That is the rather horrible question once you accept it as a forgery.

-- John Dominic Crossan

Why does John Dominic Crossan think this?

Other web pages on this site, developed from the letter, addressing some of the evidence that argues that the Shroud of Turin may make sense as an authentic artifact: